JJZolx;615039 Wrote: > That doesn't sound like a good idea to me. It tells the customer he > needs all that gear just to get a radio to play a single note. It's > like putting big orange safety warning stickers on a kids' toy and > expecting anyone to buy it. > > I think someone at Logitech has figured out that the Squeezebox thin > client approach just isn't a mass market product. It may be profitable > now that they've pulled most of the development and QA staff off of the > project, but I don't think Logitech is likely to ramp up marketing or > development again. > > A revamped Touch that can run the server with much better performance > and stability may make sense. Even though the Touch is relatively new, > it was in beta testing for a long time and the hardware design and > prototyping undoubtedly took a while before that. The design is now > years old, so it's conceivable that they could produce a much more > powerful machine for the same price today. To me, that's the only new > Squeezebox product that would make any sense at all.
So when I see a Touch or a Radio at Best Buy and it doesn't do a thing but turn-on how do I know what it does? DUH? The issue is that most people ALREADY have the other stuff. Which hand do you use? P -- pski real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. It is truly the Golden Age of Wireless ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85982 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
