Pascal Hibon wrote: 
> I believe that this device should focus on the transport side of things.
> This should not be an attempt to be a high quality DAC with all bells
> and whistles attached to it. There are plenty of external high quality
> DAC’s out there. I think that most users here are using an external DAC
> with their Squeezeboxes any way.

Squeezemenicely wrote: 
> Absolutely agree. Adding high quality DaC to the device would only
> increase the price and users interested in high quality sound have a DAC
> anyway, since they always used one with their SBs.
> So, good analogue out plus SPDIF and USB to connect a DAC to make things
> sound better, should be enough.
> 
> 
> Since the Wandboard already has SPDIF out, would that already be ok? Or
> too much jitter? No idea if there is different quality in SPDIF out -
> but sure there are people here who could explain.
> 
> 
> What is the inbuilt analogue out on the Wandboard like? Good enough?

I think there was a modular aproach being discussed Wandbord + something
,that something could be Analog boards of all kinds of quality and "Good
analogue" can very close to the best anyway :)

Re balanced of course a line driver circuit could be used , i think John
imidietly thougth of the typical high end aproach with dual balanced
DAC's , but for long run's of cable to active speakers even a balanced
oine driver would be a benefit .

Anyhow a new feature request .

Built in attenuators with dip switches/jumpers like the transporter but
on both unbalanced and balanced .


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97881

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to