I'm just curious because I look at the comments. did you post a comment explaining you were a blind user of this universal accessibility and that it is more than just a highlight reader speech app?

the reason why blidness software doesn't get mentioned is because we don't mention it in a possitive manner. and if they don't mention it in a good way, take the initiative and mention the possitives.

also I kind of like the fact that apple didn't make a media hore of itself and didn't make a big deal about accessibility in itunes. if it was M$ they would held a press conferance and I thought we were trying to be normal and just like everyone else. we don't need a media parade every time some thing works for us. if it works it works.

Gabe

On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Holly Anderson wrote:

This article did make me laugh a bit, but at the same time it kind of makes me sad. It seems the only press voice over ever gets in the mainstream mac sites is that it is annoying and how do I turn it off. I'm not saying vo should get top story or anything like that, but when the itunes update came out and was accessible that was mentioned nowhere. I tried emailing some podcasters about it and when I did get responses it was like oh that's cool but they never mentioned it on the podcasts. It just sometimes feels like we are invisible in both the blindness community and the sighted community as well. I remember when tiger came out and it had voice over, I never heard voice over mentioned. People talked about spotlight being new and all the cool new features but voice over was never mentioned. If I didn't read blindness related blogs and that sort of thing I wouldn't know about voice over.

I'm not saying sighted people should always talk about voice over, but a positive mention every now and then wouldn't hurt would it?
Holly
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:


Here's a link, good for a chuckle.

http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/mac911/2007/04/accidentua/ index.php?lsrc=mwrss

Thought you all might enjoy.




Reply via email to