If they have a decent linux distro they would be able to run Abiword or
other faster word processors anyway so is not like people will get locked
out.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:06:22 -0000, Lars D. Noodén
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've run it with 128 MB on a 133 MHz PII, but that was under Debian and
RedHat. It was slow, but acceptable for my parts. It was also OOo 1.1
The MIT $100 Laptop will be very important. Whether OOo runs on it
poorly, tolerably or quite well will make a big difference in the future
of OOo. And probably StarOffice, too.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents endanger the legal certainty of software.
Keep them out of the EU by writing your MEP, keep the market open.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 09:44:02 AM -0000, Alexandro Colorado
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:07:50 -0000, Lars D. Noodén
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is OOo2 likely to run comfortably on those specs?
Or will it need to be pared down and streamlined for OOo3 first?
Many people had run OOo on 64Mb of Ram. So no worries about this.
You're kidding right? OOo is really slow with twice that RAM.
Ciao,
Marco
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
