Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: > What you may mean and what we could (and should) have is a (common) > vision where we are heading.
There are four or five pages on the existing OOo website that state what the current common vision is. Of course the only one that happens to be semi-meaningful is not on the OOo website. > - There is a marketplace where open source developers as well as commercial > entities can offer their services. A how to for that would be useful. > sure that, if you ask, most people can give you a list of what's coming > and what they are thinking about. I am referring to pages that are labelled as "Roadmap for OOo V x.x. Pages that purport to be official representations of where the project is going. > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Meta/Organization Stuff like that is going to be worse than the current situation. My suggestion is along the lines of http://en.openoffice.org/wiki/Organization as a disambiguation page for http://en.openoffice.org/wiki/Organization_Uno http://en.openoffice.org/wiki/Organization_Marketing etc. Everything related to the UNO project gets labelled as {{Category:UNO Project]] Everything related to the art project is labelled {{Category:ART Project}} A page can belong to two or more categories. The idea here is that all that one has to do to find information is write http:://en.openoffice.org/wiki/whatever-the-person-is-looking-for. If that page doesn't exist, then they go to search. By having stuff like http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Meta/Organization you ensure that nobody except members of the project will be able to find data. And that defeats the entire point of using a wiki. You might as well go back to using subversion and having to check data out using SVN. xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
