We have an IRC.

I really like the idea of having the discussion as just that a discussion.
Then create a mailing list for our newsletter. That way we can offer people
to join that without seeing all of our crazy!


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Philip P. Patnode <ppatn...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Merely a suggestion, but has anyone considered a "chat room" on the SH
> webpage?
>
> Check out this link for an example of a open chat session that can appear
> on synhak.org at no cost to the org.
>
> Link = http://chatango.com/creategroup?html5&ts=0010000009234112500
>
> Might be a good place for all off-topic conversations.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Steve Radonich IV 
> <nesfr...@outlook.com>wrote:
>
>>  I personally would love to see forums where we could all post and have
>> a thread for projects we are working on
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>>
>> From: "Chris Egeland" <ch...@chrisegeland.com>
>> Sent: November 13, 2013 4:52 PM
>> To: discuss@synhak.org
>> Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Offtopic List?
>>
>>  *watches the subscriber count jump by two*
>>
>> Yeah, the subreddit exists.  Nothing really gets posted to it due to its
>> low subscriber count.
>>
>> We usually post stuff to /r/Akron and /r/Cleveland rather than to the
>> subreddit itself.  However, if you really value your precious interweb
>> points, feel free to post something there and ask for up-phongs to the
>> negative x-axis.  At least I'll upvote you.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 11/13/2013 4:40 PM, Ben Lippincott wrote:
>>
>> WHAT?! WHY WAS I NOT TOLD ABOUT THIS? aaaaaaa reddit i love you
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Chris Egeland <ch...@chrisegeland.com>wrote:
>>
>> Forums were discussed a couple of years ago in the beginning.  The
>> opposition to them was that people would have to register in order to use
>> them, and then it's another web app that we have to maintain, apply
>> security patches to, and everyone else would have to remember credentials
>> for.  Personally, I don't think the community (members, friends of the
>> space, people interested in us, etc) is large enough to justify running
>> something like vBulletin, SMF or phpBB.
>>
>> Reddit is kinda already implemented (we have a SYN/HAK subreddit), but I
>> think only a handful of us actually use the site.  The subreddit has
>> something like six posts in 8 months.
>>
>> More mailing lists appeals to me because it makes it possible for people
>> to subscribe to channels of discussion that are relevant to them.  For
>> example, if we were to start making mailing lists that are specific to
>> individual projects (for example, the Power Racing Series cars), someone
>> who is uninterested in the project could browse the pipermail archives if
>> they wanted to see what was going on with the project.  If they were then
>> interested in the project, they could join the list and become active that
>> way.
>>
>> Sure, it's nice to have one big massive list that everyone subscribes to,
>> but eventually you start to get the people that are overwhelmed with the
>> amount of email they are receiving.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> On 11/13/2013 4:20 PM, Ben Lippincott wrote:
>>
>> We could make a private subreddit
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Justin Herman <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Seems like a different medium might work better. I fear that different
>> people will have different opinions about what is off-topic.
>> Maybe instead....
>> Fourm
>> Reddit
>> etc.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Ben Lippincott <
>> benji.lippinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wooot! Let's do it!
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Bethany Munyan <beth.mun...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking the same thing. I like the idea of having an 'off-topic'
>> mailing list.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Chris Egeland <ch...@chrisegeland.com>wrote:
>>
>> Hey hackers!
>>
>> I've been watching the mailing lists very closely for some time now, and
>> have noticed a general uptrend in the volume of email sent to the discuss
>> list.  Sometimes we get offtopic and go off on tangents about toast, or
>> other topics which are fun to talk about, but are ultimately irrelevant to
>> the space itself.  Usually, this isn't a problem, but for someone who is
>> interested in the space, but not the minutiae of every little bit of
>> day-to-day operations, it can quickly turn into an overwhelming amount of
>> email.
>>
>> Today, I'm asking for input on how we should proceed with the mailing
>> lists.  As you may know, we currently have 5 lists, two of which are
>> public, one semipublic, and two private. discuss@synhak.org and
>> annou...@synhak.org are the two that everyone knows about.  Members may
>> know that they are automatically subscribed to memb...@synhak.org.
>>  Board members are subscribed to bo...@synhak.org and us sysadmin folk
>> are members of sysad...@synhak.org.
>>
>> My recommendation is to create an "offtopic" list, which would have very
>> very lax rules on what can be posted.  Anything you want to chat about.
>>  Want to debate why the RubberDucks is a terrible team name and the Aeros
>> was WAY better?  Sure, no problem.  Got a pothole on Market street that
>> irks you every day?  Have at it.  Joke threads? Toast? No problem.  The
>> other side to this idea is that the discuss list would have some basic
>> rules imposed that mean that any topics to the discuss list would be
>> required to be relevant to the space itself.  Projects occurring at the
>> space would be relevant topics, open hours discussion, meeting minutes, etc.
>>
>> So, let me know what you guys think.  I'm not officially proposing this,
>> but we may chat about it at the next meeting as a discussion topic, because
>> it would fundamentally mean we change how the mailing lists are organized
>> and structured.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   --
>> Thanks!
>>  Ben Lippincott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Thanks!
>>  Ben Lippincott
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing 
>> listDiscuss@synhak.orghttps://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Thanks!
>>  Ben Lippincott
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing 
>> listDiscuss@synhak.orghttps://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@synhak.org
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@synhak.org
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to