I was thinking about this... you could create a temp query and use an IN clause (with a QoQ). Would be a lot cleaner than this...
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Clint Willard <clint...@gmail.com> wrote: > Long as we're off topic.. > > - No time for long emails > - More than meat of the matter is fat > - I love bullet points > > Sentences and paragraphs are so old school. We don't need no > stinkin grammar neither. > > *Clint * > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:17 PM, <szwedo...@epamail.epa.gov> wrote: > >> I also favor using as many words as necessary to communicate clearly. >> There really is no reason to compromise clarity for brevity's sake. My >> keyboard produces just as many words as I need, neither more nor less. >> >> ed >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> Ed Szwedo >> Web Development Team Lead >> ECS Team - ITS-EPA II Contractor >> >> 109 TW Alexander Drive, Building NCC, Mail Drop N176-05, Research >> Triangle Park, NC 27711 >> Information Technology Infrastructure Solutions | Office: (919)541-3955 >> | Fax: (919)541-3641 | szwedo...@epa.gov | www.ecs-federal.com >> >> >> >> From: "Charlie Arehart" <char...@carehart.org> >> To: <discussion@acfug.org> >> Date: 08/25/2011 01:01 PM >> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF >> statements >> Sent by: ad...@acfug.org >> >> >> >> Sadly, you and I are a dying breed, it seems. :-) There’s a definite >> subset of the culture who decidedly do NOT like any email longer than a >> couple of sentences—even if it means sacrificing clarity for brevity. >> >> Twitter has only exacerbated the problem by catering to that whim. It’s >> clearly a cultural shift that’s been at play for some time. I write >> emails like people of old wrote letters. Sadly, people don’t do that >> anymore. And sadly, those of this ilk aren’t vocal about it: they just >> won’t read an email that’s “too long” in their opinion, yet they’ll >> respond in a thread without acknowledging that, which can cause more >> confusion. >> >> Oh well, c’est la vie. :-) As you say, I don’t stop. Some appreciate it >> (whether in email, blog entries, and so on), and I write for them. :-) >> Thanks for the encouragement, though others may hold it against you! >> >> /charlie >> >> From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick >> Peavy >> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:52 AM >> To: discussion@acfug.org >> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements >> >> Well, don't stop. I prefer content over confusion (short). >> >> __________________ >> Derrick Peavy >> >> On Aug 25, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Charlie Arehart wrote: >> >> Me and my “long” emails, I guess. ;-} >> >> /charlie >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ >> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform >> >> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists >> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ >> List hosted by FusionLink >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > -- Steve Ross web application & interface developer http://blog.stevensross.com [mobile] (912) 344-8113 [ AIM / Yahoo! : zeriumsteven ] [googleTalk : nowhiding ]
