# jah [2017-06-21 17:46 +0200]:
If it is true that humans tend to seek out ideas that confirm their own, then it seems likely FSFE's twitter followers belong to the set of people who do not need convincing to use and further Free Software.
As one of the maintainers of the FSFE's Twitter account, I cannot confirm your theory. Our Twitter sphere (direct followers and their followers) may be tech-oriented but by far not only convinced Free Software enthusiasts. Just some groups in our Twitter audience I think we wouldn't reach via GNU Social/Diaspora alone: - tech journalists - politicians concerned about digital politics - supporters and members of other civil organisations covering digital topics but not FS - some people who we won by campaigns about slightly different topics we conducted, e.g. "Document Freedom Day" or "They don't want you to" - random tech people who love some of our promo material (like the nocloud stickers) but don't affiliated with Free Software before Following the various discussions about this for many years, I alwayscome to the same personal conclusions:
- Forcing our "followers" to use a proprietary network in order to get our messages is bad. We have to offer Free Software alternatives, if available. - Everything we post via proprietary channels must be available on at least one Free Software channel (except a message is only targeted to users of a certain network, e.g. a call for Facebook users to switch to Diaspora) - Whether or not to use a certain proprietary service has to be decided on an estimation whether a) we can reach more people who we couldn't reach via Free Software alternatives, and b) whether the time/money spent is worth the results. - We have to inform our users about the negative effects of the various proprietary networks, especially those we use – something we already do on fsfe.org by linking to [1] at various occasions. - We shouldn't restrict our volunteers in the tools they want to use to fight for Free Software. If a local group is convinced that it should promote their meetings via Facebook, let them do that as long as they don't promote Facebook as the best or only tool. With the FSFE's Twitter and Facebook presence, I'm positive that all requirements are met. Best, Max [1] https://wiki.fsfe.org/Advocacy/ProprietaryWebServices -- Max Mehl - Free Software Foundation Europe - Program Manager Contact and further information: https://fsfe.org/about/mehl Private weblog: (blog.mehl.mx) | Private homepage: (mehl.mx) Support advocacy for Free Software: https://fsfe.org/donate
pgpbzftyROExn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion