On Thursday, January 31, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > So, here's my suggestion for a way forward: > > 1. PEP 426 incorporates the "new versioning algorithm" section from > PEP 386 directly rather than by reference, with the clarification that > a top level "dev" release should be sorted before the first alpha > release > 2. I accept PEP 426 > 3. I reject PEP 386 (there's a lot of irrelevant stuff in there about > changing distutils itself which is never going to happen anway) > 4. I buy Daniel several beverages of his choice at PyCon US for > putting up with all this extra cleanup of the metadata spec that he > wasn't expecting when he proposed his update ;) > > Thoughts? Sounds reasonable to me.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
