> a top level "dev" release should be sorted before the first alpha
> release
>
ok, so applying this to the example in pep386 (and your comment about
interpreting a top-level "dev" as "a0.dev"), the sorting would be like
this?
new ... V('1.0dev1')
new ... < V('1.0a0.dev2')
new ... < V('1.0dev3')
313 ... < V('1.0a1')
314 ... < V('1.0a2.dev456')
315 ... < V('1.0a2')
316 ... < V('1.0a2.1.dev456')
317 ... < V('1.0a2.1')
318 ... < V('1.0b1.dev456')
319 ... < V('1.0b2')
320 ... < V('1.0b2.post345')
321 ... < V('1.0c1.dev456')
322 ... < V('1.0c1')
323 ... < V('1.0.dev456')
324 ... < V('1.0')
325 ... < V('1.0.post456.dev34')
326 ... < V('1.0.post456'))
327 True
Marcus
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
