And patience is fairly difficult when dealing with obvious concern trolls. That has been especially annoying on members@, board@, etc, where we’re supposed to assume good faith. However, only one side in the game takes a loss when doing so in an iterated game. I’d rather not summarize the depressing relationship between game theory and discourse, but I hope you get the idea.
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 16:29, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a project, it could use dev@ and user@ like typical projects. User > list for questions, dev list for research and actions. It sort of makes > sense. > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 16:23, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 2019-05-13 16:37, Griselda Cuevas wrote: >> > Teaching by preaching is what will earn us respect, credibility and >> > authority to speak of this topic. >> >> Gris, can I ask what you mean by "preaching" in this context? >> >> For me this has a very negative connotation and feels out of place in a >> secular organisation such as the ASF. >> >> -Joan >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org >> >> -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
