On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 07:12 -0800, Michael Newman wrote: > > > The idea is to replace contrib.comments a bit prior to 1.0. So patches > > to the existing contrib.comments probably aren't that useful at the > > moment. Jacob's already done a lot of the work on the rewrite. Stay away > > from that for the time being. > > That's why I ask before I do. Is Jacob also redoing the auth system
The auth system is (more or less) completely unrelated to comments, as far as I'm aware. I think you might be confusing multiple unrelated things here. You're filtering things based on "uses oldforms" or not. I'm just splintering off a portion and saying "don't worry about that bit just yet". All I wanted to point out is that going nuts and extending into django.contrib.comments is probably slightly duplicated effort at this moment in time. We can live with the current status quo in that directory for now (the only patches worth applying are where changes elsewhere would mean comments completely break, so patching comments to work again would be worthwhile). Cheers, Malcolm -- Why be difficult when, with a little bit of effort, you could be impossible. http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
