@Everyone who has commented here. I never intended to cause any animosity and I really appreciate everything that the core team does for us all.
@Jacob I really do intend to write code. I make money doing non-Django development but I love Django so much that I spend 25+ hours a week not getting paid just so I can learn to adopt Django and eventually replace my income with Django development. I think I might even be part pony (DNA testing underway). There are just certain elements of Django that I feel (slightly) holds back a developer of large multi- tenant architecture, which could be a really big way to get major enterprises on-board, and this is where I intend to contribute the most. I just don't have the time (or money after Uncle Sam's 30k this March) to spend on contributing if I'm not sure my ideas will be accepted. This is why I want to spend a little time getting the 5,000 foot view so that my ideas are in sync with what users want, what the core team will accept and what works best with ``from future import *``. If I spend 100% more time on preparing to save 50% of my time, I'll be happy because I've learned more. @Russell Thanks for indulging in conversation, if just for the meta thoughts, this is precisely the sort of macro conversation that helps me understand the Django process's rationale. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.