On 28/09/12 08:41, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Yeah, I think I mentioned it a couple of times at DjangoCon but perhaps > not loudly enough - Jacob and I had a talk at DjangoCon EU where he said > he wanted it all in core, and I tend to agree. > > Preston has had a look at what I'm doing/planning with AppCache and > apparently it'll be compatable with what's in app-loading with a little > work, which is reassuring. > > Only remaining question is whether migration-runner (the smarts) should > be in contrib or core. I know Alex believes core; I'm split, seeing as > some people will want to turn it off (so contrib), but it overrides core > commands like syncdb (so core would be cleaner).
I'm very happy with South being in core/contrib, but I am aware of other people who use different solutions. It would be nice if we didn't make life hard for them. I don't know what that means in practice, but if we got feedback from the developers of those other solutions it would be good. We might need something like a 'syncdb --ignore-migrations' option. Luke -- "Because Your lovingkindness is better than life, My lips shall praise You." (Ps 63:3) Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
