#7609: Document that PositiveIntegerField and co have a misleading name
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Gergely Kontra       |                    Owner:  nobody
  <pihentagy+djangoproject@…>        |                   Status:  new
         Type:  Bug                  |                  Version:  SVN
    Component:  Documentation        |               Resolution:
     Severity:  Normal               |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
     Keywords:  name convention,     |      Needs documentation:  0
  rename                             |  Patch needs improvement:  0
    Has patch:  1                    |                    UI/UX:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |
Easy pickings:  0                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by bpeschier):

 Might it be a good thing to actually mention we know positive should mean
 "higher than 0", but the field accepts 0 due to backwards compatibility?
 It saves people a search on the trac for tickets relating to it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:11>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Reply via email to