#7609: Document that PositiveIntegerField and co have a misleading name
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Gergely Kontra | Owner:
<pihentagy+djangoproject@…> | paulcollins
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Documentation | Version: SVN
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: name convention, | Triage Stage: Accepted
rename | Needs documentation: 0
Has patch: 1 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Needs tests: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Easy pickings: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by paulcollins):
* owner: nobody => paulcollins
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
Comment:
Replying to [comment:15 julien]:
> Replying to [comment:13 paulcollins]:
>
> No need to use a "..note" directive. Just need to say that, despite its
name, it accepts 0 for B-C reasons.
Two versions one with the link to this ticket and one without. Let me know
if you need some other change to it, otherwise feel free to use either one
:)
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:16>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
