#7609: Document that PositiveIntegerField and co have a misleading name -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Gergely Kontra | Owner: nobody <pihentagy+djangoproject@…> | Status: new Type: Bug | Version: SVN Component: Documentation | Resolution: Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted Keywords: name convention, | Needs documentation: 0 rename | Patch needs improvement: 1 Has patch: 1 | UI/UX: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Easy pickings: 0 | -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by julien): Replying to [comment:13 paulcollins]: > Should I include that kind of information as a ..note:: or just put something to the effect of > [[br]] > Like an :class:`IntegerField`, but must be positive. Also accepts 0 for backward compatibility reasons (link to this ticket)? No need to use a "..note" directive. Just need to say that, despite its name, it accepts 0 for B-C reasons. -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:15> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.