#7609: Document that PositiveIntegerField and co have a misleading name
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Gergely Kontra | Owner: nobody
<pihentagy+djangoproject@…> | Status: new
Type: Bug | Version: SVN
Component: Documentation | Resolution:
Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted
Keywords: name convention, | Needs documentation: 0
rename | Patch needs improvement: 1
Has patch: 1 | UI/UX: 0
Needs tests: 0 |
Easy pickings: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by paulcollins):
Should I include that kind of information as a ..note:: or just put
something to the effect of
[[br]]
Like an :class:`IntegerField`, but must be positive. Also accepts 0 for
backward compatibility reasons (link to this ticket)?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:13>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
