On 10/06/2014 10:24 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Tim Draegen <t...@eudaemon.net
<mailto:t...@eudaemon.net>> wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it
<mailto:ves...@tana.it>> wrote:
> IMHO, we should specify a credible MLM model, even if that can be
> slightly off topic for the WG, in order to maximize its
probability of
> being adopted. The rest of this message has some notes to this end.
Can I get some clarification on the intent here? As worded, this
paragraph suggests that we are looking to produce a model for MLMs to
follow in a DMARC-aware world. I was under the impression that (a)
this is a non-starter, and (b) we're not chartered to do so.
I believe your impression is correct. Let's not start working on MLM's.
/rolf
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
