On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Tim Draegen <t...@eudaemon.net> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > IMHO, we should specify a credible MLM model, even if that can be > > slightly off topic for the WG, in order to maximize its probability of > > being adopted. The rest of this message has some notes to this end. > Can I get some clarification on the intent here? As worded, this paragraph suggests that we are looking to produce a model for MLMs to follow in a DMARC-aware world. I was under the impression that (a) this is a non-starter, and (b) we're not chartered to do so. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
