On November 9, 2014 4:31:31 AM EST, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org> wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >> From: ned+dm...@mrochek.com >> To: "John Levine" <jo...@taugh.com> >> Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, superu...@gmail.com >> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 10:47:20 AM >> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base feedback >> >> >> > For From: headers with address-free groups, recall that the >motivation >> > for this was EAI downgrades at delivery time. The un-downgraded >> > message had a normal From: header, so normal DMARC applies. If the >> > address is smashed in the downgrade I don't see any reason that the >> > DMARC result needs to change. >> >> Neither do I. > >Conclusion, a DMARC enabled MTA MUST be SMTPUTF8 enabled (so there is >no to little reasons to downgrade).
In that case, DMARC ought to be deferred for several years. I don't think you really mean that. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
