On Friday, December 19, 2014 01:30:10 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Colleagues, > > draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base is nearing IESG conflict review, and it's been > pointed out that a review from back in April has not been properly attended > to. > > Could I get the WG (forgive me, co-chairs!) to comment on this so that I > can see what changes might be appropriate here? Having this resolved > before the telechat in the first week of January would be truly delightful. > > Note that some amount of this may have already been addressed (it was about > -04; -08 is current, and at least the ABNF issue Jim raises will be handled > in -09), so please at least check -08 when considering your responses. > > The posting: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00764.html
There was a recent thread on postfix-users about DMARC rejections when there are DNS errors that caused me to review -08 to see what it says on the matter. At the end of section 5.6.2, it says: Handling of messages for which SPF and/or DKIM evaluation encounters a DNS error is left to the discretion of the Mail Receiver. Further discussion is available in Section 5.6.3. My reading of 5.6.3 though is that it only discusses DNS errors in the context of failing to retrieve the DMARC record. Any discussion about handling DNS errors for SPF/DKIM seems to be missing. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
