On 7/7/2020 8:47 AM, Hector Santos wrote:
The problem has been Signer Reputation wanting to push out DKIM
Policy:
Layer 1: DKIM Policy Deterministic protocol
Layer 2: DKIM Signer Trust/Reputation
The argument has always been by Mr. Levine and others, why need Layer
1 [if] all we need is layer 2?
The answer is that Layer 1 is an deterministic immediate filtering
process to remove the contaminants of a mail stream, similar to an
osmosis process. It includes checking RFC5322 correctness, like double
5322.From lines, to address fake MUA from Display replay concerns.
But the push to use only Layer 1 perpetuated the brush back and
delayed the adjusted needed in Layer 1 to address authorized resigner
issues that Layer 2 will need.
Arggg, I really do need to take my time when I write.
Correction:
But the push to use only [Layer 2] perpetuated the brush back and
delayed the [adjustments] needed in Layer 1 to address authorized
resigner
issues that Layer 2 will need.
--
Hector Santos,
https://secure.santronics.com
https://twitter.com/hectorsantos
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
