On 2020-08-04 6:10 p.m., Dotzero wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:39 AM Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net> wrote: >> On 8/2/20 5:43 PM, Douglas E. Foster wrote: >>> As to the transparency question, it should be clear that there will be >>> no simple solution to the ML problem. >> >> Actually, there is: If your domain has users that use mailing lists, >> don't publish 'reject' or 'quarantine' policies. Generally this means to >> just use those policies for domains used for transactional email. >> >> Unfortunately we seem to be focused on very complex technical solutions >> to a misdeployment problem. >> >> > There is another solution. Move users to a separate domain from the domain > your transactional mails are sent from. You can also put users on a > separate subdomain.
Yet another solution would be to not use DMARC. The status quo ante. While p=none is a technically valid position, there seems to be a demand of a mail infrastructure where spoofing is not allowed. Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
