On 8/12/2020 5:55 AM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 5:13 AM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net <mailto:d...@dcrocker.net>> wrote:On 8/12/2020 4:45 AM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: > Mr. Crocker, is there a document that describes some of these proposals > and perhaps the best arguments for an against somewhere? The firehose of > learning would a bit easier if there were a FAQ. I think it might even > help the participants if this was all documented. Yes, I know there's > the archived but I mean an organized and linear doc. If you have particular questions, ask them.I've just recently started lurking but I think this is a discussion about semantics. What to call a proposed RFC5322.Sender field.
The reference to field name was for an alternative to the rfc5322.From field, not sender.
The problem being addressed is the munging of headers by mailing lists and other forwarders, breaking things like DKIM.
mailing lists pretty much always break DKIM. One of the proposals is to try to recover signature validation, post hoc.
I've not been lurking long enough to grok what's going on but I'll continue to lurk and learn, eventually finding a small way to contribute to this effort even if it's just to sweep out the IETF Ashram. :-)
Welcome aboard. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
