On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:47 PM Seth Blank <seth= 40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> At a minimum, per Dave's comments here: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XXE3r5FUozl6LVohv8rTkn5QG4E/ > I still believe there's some clear consistent language that needs to be > agreed upon to drive the appropriate specificity in the document. > +1 about clarifying the terminology and I'd second Steve Jones's point about defining the terms in the RFC for consistent usage throughout both the RFC and any usage-related BCPs. Functionally, I think that we need to break down the actions of a receiver (whether ultimate or intermediary) a bit more clearly: - "validate" = go through the process of determining a DMARC pass verdict (or not) - "enforce" = take some sort of action on the basis of DMARC results + policy (published + local) - "report" = send RUA (and possibly RUF) reports --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
