Hi. I wanted to call everyone's attention to how draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00 differs from the existing RFC 7489.
The key differences are as follows: - Section 7, DMARC Feedback, has been mostly removed except for a paragraph that mentions that reporting will be discussed in a different document (as per current plans) - Section 9, Privacy Considerations, has been removed (under the expectation that they'll be discussed in the reporting documents) - Appendix C, DMARC XML Schema, has been removed (under the expectation that it'll be discussed in the the reporting documents) - Remaining target references to "verifying-external-destinations", "failure-reports", and "aggregate-reports", which were anchors in the removed sections mentioned above, have been replaced by hand-wavy language referencing "The DMARC reporting document(s)" - The Abstract and Introduction section have been rewritten as an attempt to address issue #80 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/80> - *DMARCbis Should Have a Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC* Obviously the text applicable to the first four bullet points above will evolve over time, and it may not yet be the right time in the process to discuss those sections. However, the proposed new text for the Abstract and Introduction is certainly worthy of discussion at this time, I believe. On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:55 PM <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, > Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF. > > Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, > and Conformance (DMARC) > Authors : Emil Gustafsson > Todd M. Herr > John Levine > Filename : draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt > Pages : 55 > Date : 2020-11-11 > > Abstract: > This document describes the Domain-based Message Authentication, > Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) protocol. > > DMARC is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating > organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for > message validation, disposition, and reporting. Mail-receiving > organizations can in turn use these expressions of policies and > preferences to inform their mail handling decisions should they > choose to do so. > > This document obsoletes RFC 7489. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.html > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > i-d-annou...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* todd.h...@valimail.com *p:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
