All If you feel a need to be heard, that is also what the chairs are here for.
thanks tim On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:21 PM Seth Blank <s...@valimail.com> wrote: > Working Group colleagues, > > Discussion on this list is increasingly out of scope and process, > unproductive, and antagonistic. This behavior undermines the chartered work > of this group and will not be tolerated. We expect and require more civil > discourse from our participants, and remind everyone that disciplining > others is the purview of the chairs. > > The current phase of work of our charter ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/) is to deliver a > standards track DMARC document based upon operational feedback. We are not > relitigating SPF, DKIM, DMARC, or ARC, adding new functionality, or > rehashing other IETF documents or processes. > > When we kicked off DMARC bis, Alexey outlined a clear process: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/rBWzfzDa_tOhaVdxFzUBYVi46QI/ > > Only tickets opened by the Chairs or a document editor to the list are in > scope for working group discussion. Everything else should result in the > creation of a ticket to be discussed later, or off-list discussion. The > Chairs re-affirm that all tickets will be brought to the list. > > To be clear: Before you hit “send” on an email to this list, make sure it > is on topic for an open ticket and is not likely to escalate tensions. > Otherwise, delete the message or start a private conversation that is not > on the list. > > From here on out, due to the counter-productive nature of current list > discourse, off topic or antagonistic discussions will be given a single > public warning, per BCP 94 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp94), which > implies that further violations will result in a 30 day suspension for the > participant. The ADs have been consulted, and everyone should consider > themselves warned. > > Finally, several members of this working group seem to be very effective > at antagonizing each other. If a thread is spiralling, and a BCP 94 warning > is given and not heeded, all active participants in the thread after the > warning has been issued will be suspended, even if it’s to tell others to > respect the warning. > > Now, let’s get back to our chartered work at hand and open tickets. > > Seth, Tim, and Alexey, as Chairs > > -- > > *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies > *e:* s...@valimail.com > *p:* 415.273.8818 > > > This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or > proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) > authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized > recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or > distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited > and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to > this email and then delete it from your system. >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
