On 1/6/21 4:21 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
Working Group colleagues,
Discussion on this list is increasingly out of scope and process,
unproductive, and antagonistic. This behavior undermines the chartered
work of this group and will not be tolerated. We expect and require
more civil discourse from our participants, and remind everyone that
disciplining others is the purview of the chairs.
I completely recommend everybody read and understand this paper. It
doesn't address every answer to every question, but it does allow us to
be much more data driven rather than uninformed conjecture. It's fine to
dispute its conclusions, but it is not fine to dispute it to just
dismiss it out of hand based on feelings or bias. It really gave me some
grounding from the gut feelings which doesn't confirm much of anything.
DKIM and DMARC need to more data and much less conjecture.
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-hu.pdf
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
