My apologies for not replying to this sooner. To give the TL;DR, I think the proposed changes adequately address my concerns.
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> writes: > In the interests of getting this document on its way, I'd like to suggest > the following edits in response to Dale's most recent message. If the > working group concurs, we can finally get this out to Last Call. > > My goal as an AD here is just to get the GenART feedback addressed, but the > text is being submitted as a WG contribution for discussion and consensus > consideration, not as a demand. Please process accordingly; I believe the > agreement is to do another WGLC on the document before it goes on its way, > so the sooner consensus is reached on all of this, the sooner it goes. Yes, I've noticed that people (even authors) forget that Gen-Art reviewers do not have veto power, they are just additional commentators. Dale _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
