On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:57 AM Dave Crocker <dcroc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, but I've lost track of which document would informationally
> document this issue.
>
> The re-writing hack is an operational one that might or might not prove
> the be transient. Having a spec note the effect of what it does, in
> terms of rendering mailing use problematic, is reasonable.
>
> Having a spec go into details about the hack of the moment isn't.  On
> the other hand, it's reasonable to put such discussion into a companion
> 'usage' doc, IMO.
>

He didn't specify, but I took the suggestion to mean a new document, not
any of the current ones.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to