It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> said: >I would argue that it's well understood by now that DKIM and SPF "pass" >results are the only things that convey usable information.
I agree. I've never seen anyone have any trouble figuring out what SPF or DKIM inputs to feed into DMARC and don't see anything to change here. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
