Please explain what you think is wrong and why. We are not voting yet, we are discussing.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:18 AM Dave Crocker <dcroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/6/2022 3:32 AM, Douglas Foster wrote: > > Consequently, the best way for senders to avoid delayed or blocked > > messages is to avoid getting close examination. This is facilitated > > by ensuring messages are both DKIM-verifiable and SPF-PASS, regardless > > of DMARC policy. P=NONE or T=Y or no policy are not valid substitutes. > > > That's doubly and impressively wrong. > > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > dcroc...@gmail.com > 408.329.0791 > > Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter > Information & Planning Coordinator > American Red Cross > dave.crock...@redcross.org > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
