>> Consequently, the best way for senders to avoid delayed or blocked >> messages is to avoid getting close examination. This is facilitated by >> ensuring messages are both DKIM-verifiable and SPF-PASS, regardless of >> DMARC policy. P=NONE or T=Y or no policy are not valid substitutes. ...
No. Just no. This isn't mission creep, it's mission gallop. DMARC is not a magic bullet to divide good mail from bad mail and we would do nobody any favors by going down this path. DMARC does what it does, and I really do not want to start opining about the way other parts of a mail system should work. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
