On Thursday, June 16, 2022 11:57:08 AM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Wed 15/Jun/2022 19:47:42 +0200 John Levine wrote: > > It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: > >>I think we found the few critical domains which need a flag. > >> > > We may have found some domains that need a psd flag, but it's silly to > > assert we have found all or even most of them. > > > > The PSL has 9300 entries and there are surely far more places in the DNS > > than that where you want sibling domains to be separate. > > Is there someone who is going to contact, on behalf of the WG, the domains > that were found in order to have their owners publish psd= flags before the > RFC is published?
It is a project I intend to work on once the psd= tag has been assigned. Until the working group has settled on it more definitively than "it's in the current draft" I think it would be premature to bother them. >From your list further down the thread, why do you think having a psd=y tag on gov.uk, police.uk, and mil will have? While it would be more descriptively correct, I don't think there's any operational difference if it's there or not since sub-domains of those PSDs are controlled by one organization. If us.com had a DMARC record, that would be worth a discussion, but they don't. It's not even the ~500 domains on the PSL that have DMARC records published that we need to concern ourselves with, it's a small subset of them. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
