On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:45 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> I don't know... I would say that if the working group has rough > consensus to reach out and asks someone(s) to do it, they could then > say that they're calling on behalf of the working group. No? > > Barry > Personally, if this is implemented, I think it would be better if a group like M3AAWG were to volunteer or take on such a role. Murray has pointed out some of the issues with someone reaching out on behalf of the working group. The only people I can think of who could remotely claim to represent the working group would be the chairs. Do we really want to go there? Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc