On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:45 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org>
wrote:

> I don't know... I would say that if the working group has rough
> consensus to reach out and asks someone(s) to do it, they could then
> say that they're calling on behalf of the working group.  No?
>
> Barry
>

Personally, if this is implemented, I think it would be better if a group
like M3AAWG were to volunteer or take on such a role. Murray has pointed
out some of the issues with someone reaching out on behalf of the working
group. The only people I can think of who could remotely claim to represent
the working group would be the chairs. Do we  really want to go there?

Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to