On June 18, 2022 10:35:11 PM UTC, Dotzero <dotz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:45 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org>
>wrote:
>
>> I don't know... I would say that if the working group has rough
>> consensus to reach out and asks someone(s) to do it, they could then
>> say that they're calling on behalf of the working group. No?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>
>Personally, if this is implemented, I think it would be better if a group
>like M3AAWG were to volunteer or take on such a role. Murray has pointed
>out some of the issues with someone reaching out on behalf of the working
>group. The only people I can think of who could remotely claim to represent
>the working group would be the chairs. Do we really want to go there?
I had been thinking M3AAWG would be a good venue. fTLD (who runs .bank and .
insurance) recently gave a presentation about PSD DMARC at an ICANN tech day.
I think there are multiple avenues of approach that we can use without having
to invoke the IETF directly.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
