I have to say, as a participant, that I have more than a little sympathy for this suggestion or some derivative of it. Using "psd" as the tag name is rooted in history that will be lost as we move away from using a public suffix list.
Barry On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:20 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > On Sun 26/Jun/2022 18:05:44 +0200 Barry Leiba wrote: > > > > Please comment in this thread about whether you agree with making the > > registration now, or whether you do not agree and why. > > > I'd like to make a last appeal to use more intuitive symbols to be used > instead > of the current ones: > > instead of | use | to mean > -----------+----------+----------------------------------------------------- > psd=u | role=sub | the default subdomain role (never needed) > psd=n | role=org | the org domain (only needed with non compliant PSDs) > psd=y | role=psd | a PSD (needed if PSD published DMARC record.) > > > The reason to use cryptic symbols seems to be to discourage their usage, which > I can hardly understand. I'd be OK with the current symbols if the WG can > explain somewhat better, possibly as part of the spec itself, the rationale of > using counter-intuitive yes/ no/ undefined to express that three-valued value. > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc