I'm super unclear what you're talking about.

https://dmarc.org/2022/03/dmarc-policies-up-84-for-2021/

Aggregate reporting is used by the largest volume senders on earth, and the
vast majority of mail received by mailbox providers comes with a dmarc
record and reporting address attached.

This is umpteen billions of messages a day that get aggregated into reports.

What are you getting at? That seems pretty internet scale to me...

Seth

On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I began wondering if Aggregate Reporting works only because DMARC has been
> embraced by a small portion of domain owners.
>
> 1) Is Aggregate Reporting a significant portion of all mail?  In some
> cases, Yes.
>
> My organization's data:
> Inbound volume is 11 times greater than my outbound volume.
> Inbound mail has 1 new domain for every 5 messages
>
> Net result:   If I were to do reporting, and reporting became requested
> for most or all domains, my outbound mail volume would triple, because my
> outbound report volume would be twice as large as my outbound business mail
> volume.
>
> 2) Is Aggregate Reporting efficient?   Restating previous concerns:
>
> "All Signature" reporting means:
> We keep evaluating even after successful authentication has been
> established,
> so that we can capture and store data of little actual value,
> even though it causes reduced aggregation and longer reports.
>
> "No Problems found, No changes found" reporting means:
> We send redundant reports day after day.
>
> "All Requesters" reporting means:
> We send reports even to domain owners that were blocked because of domain
> reputation.
>
> A good place to start would be to extend the reporting interval for
> no-problem-found reports.
>
> Doug Foster
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to