It appears that Seth Blank <s...@valimail.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >This feels too complicated, and like it adds back in complexity that jumps >between labels, which was the exact confusion (jumping instead of walking) >that the tree walk aimed to fixed.
It also adds all the problems you get with CNAMEs, like long chains and loops. If you have enough control over your DMARC records to add a "refer" thing, why couldn't you just copy the policy you want to use? While I agree that the results for ret.bmcc.cuny.edu will be different, I see precious little reason to think that anyone would care. If people can find examples where it's more plausible that the difference would matter, please send them along. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
