On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:13 AM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It becomes a simple choice: Lists can adapt to operate the way AOL and > others want them to work, or they can keep to the old ways and live with > the consequences. When the old ways cause damage, I don't think the > damage is any longer a DMARC problem. We should formally document how to > implement a DMARC-compatible mailing list, and then stop worrying about > those who don't want to be DMARC-compatible. > In what way do "the old ways cause damage"? What damage? They didn't change anything. Abruptly, unilaterally, declaring the entire global deployed mailing list base to be obsolete is a strikingly audacious move. Still, if something like what you're proposing could gain acceptance and commitment from the mailing list community, you just might have a consensus solution on your hands. I suggest approaching them to ask. They may not be able to accept it as-is, but could have a counter-proposal that we find palatable. -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
