I removed the small section that faced objections.

I updated the ridtxt definition and discovered that mmark was making a mess of those asterisks. 
 When there are more than one/some on a single line, it believes you would like some subset to 
be defined as "<em>" things.

Looks pretty good.  Minor points:

The first paragraph in 2.6 says:

    Where the URI specified in a "rua" tag does not specify otherwise, a
    Mail Receiver generating a feedback report SHOULD employ a secure
    transport mechanism.

Since the only mechanism is mail and nobody's going to S/MIME encrypt their reports, I suggest just deleting it.

6.3:

    Mail Receivers should have no concerns in sending reports as they do
    not contain personal information.  ...

    Domain Owners should have no concerns in receiving reports as they do
    not contain personal information.

As explained in 6.1, that's not actually true if the domains are small enuogh. In some of my tiny domains I can often recognize individual messages I've sent. I'd just delete these sentences.

R's,
John


-----Original Message-----
From: dmarc <dmarc-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 7:39 PM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.

   Title           : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
   Author          : Alex Brotman
   Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt
   Pages           : 28
   Date            : 2023-04-24

Abstract:
   DMARC allows for domain holders to request aggregate reports from
   receivers.  This report is an XML document, and contains extensible
   elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later.
   The aggregate reports can be submitted to the domain holder's
   specified destination as supported by the receiver.

   This document (along with others) obsoletes RFC7489.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-
aggregate-
reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7
nLWuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqF46TKSvg$

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-
aggregate-reporting-
09.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nL
WuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEqNRr1SA$

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-
ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
09__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLWuC
bVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqFdWqTU2g$

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;!
!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLWuCbVwCD
o_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEDBiM7_A$



Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to