It appears that Barry Leiba  <barryle...@computer.org> said:
>This makes it explicitly clear that any MUST/SHOULD stuff with regard
>to using and honoring p=reject is an issue of interoperating with
>existing Internet email features.  I can accept that mechanism also,
>and so, below is my attempt at writing that proposal up.

This seems about as good as we're going to get.

I agree that advice about From: munging and anything else about how
forwarders might rewrite messages to circumvent DMARC is wildly out of
scope.  We currently don't mention ARC at all.  Dunno if it's worth
a non-normative pointer somewhere.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to