It appears that Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> said: >This makes it explicitly clear that any MUST/SHOULD stuff with regard >to using and honoring p=reject is an issue of interoperating with >existing Internet email features. I can accept that mechanism also, >and so, below is my attempt at writing that proposal up.
This seems about as good as we're going to get. I agree that advice about From: munging and anything else about how forwarders might rewrite messages to circumvent DMARC is wildly out of scope. We currently don't mention ARC at all. Dunno if it's worth a non-normative pointer somewhere. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc