Hi,

Le 07/07/2023 à 23:58, John R Levine a écrit :
> 
> Why is it up to the recipient systems (the ones that do not care) to
> make life easier for lists?  Mailing list packages already do lots of
> analysis of bounce messages.  How about if they fix their bounce
> processing to recognize DMARC failures and do something different. 

Why? Because it's brittle and will only bring them more headaches? At
the very least, DMARC would need to use its own 5xy reply code to avoid
the need for parsing the reply text…

Or simply because they are *not* DMARC participants, and thus have no
reason to read this list? Standards usually serve to organize
interoperability between participants, not to inflict demands upon
unrelated third parties that they knowingly break.

That being said, maybe there is some simpler and better advice we can
give to mailing list operators who happen to listen: "If messages
bounce, first try to forcibly set the digest sending mode for this user.
If digests bounce too, then it's not DMARC, unsubscribe as usual". If
the mailing list software has a digest mode, implementation is
straightforward, and I can see no downsides compared to unsubscribe
right from the start.

Cheers,
Baptiste

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to