On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 3:29:34 AM EDT Baptiste Carvello wrote: ... > Why? Because it's brittle and will only bring them more headaches? At > the very least, DMARC would need to use its own 5xy reply code to avoid > the need for parsing the reply text… ...
This is a very good point. The IANA Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Enhanced Status Codes Registry [1] has codes for SPF and DKIM (RFC 7372) and ARC (RFC 8617), but not DMARC. Adding one is not currently in the DMARCbis draft, but I think it should be. Scott K [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/smtp-enhanced-status-codes/smtp-enhanced-status-codes.xhtml _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
