On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:27:26 +0200, Adam wrote in message <20170820142726.ojyrd6plsfjmc...@angband.pl>:
> But sticking with just kernel names would still be much better than > the enp0s3 idea. It'd be _predictable_ in that 99% case; machines > with multiple interfaces tend to be either routers (which come > preconfigured) or servers (which have an admin who's supposed to have > a clue). ..stay with kernel names. Write whatever tools needed to help systemd etc victims recover their systems and sanity as they come onboard with us. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
