El 20/08/17 a les 21:53, fsmithred ha escrit: > On 08/20/2017 10:27 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: >> >> * systemd-udev's promise of providing _stable_ names didn't deliver. They >> still change on major kernel upgrades, and sometimes on every boot. >> And their chosen naming is utterly insane (wlxf81a671bcfae, WTF?). >> Only systemd proponents still say it's a good idea. >> > > They change? I thought they were based on which hardware slot they were > in. I've been ranting about how you have to open the box and look inside > to predict the names. Have I been wrong all this time? > > Yeah, the name on a usb dongle is insane. I didn't stick with it long > enough to figure out if that number comes from somewhere or is random. > > fsmithred > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
I suggest: ethX/wlanX naming BUT: Based on last MAC byte; - When MAC ends with :00 -> eth0 - When MAC ends with :01 -> eth1 - When MAC ends with :0A -> eth10 - When MAC ends with :10 -> eth16 * When 2 NICs have same MAC byte (01) -> eth1 & eth1a & ... eth1b * Anyway, maintain full support of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules This logic does not guarantee 100% predictable naming (think about removable NICs), but gives enough confort to a sysadmin deals any with situation. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng