El 20/08/17 a les 16:48, Lars Noodén ha escrit: > On 08/20/2017 04:38 PM, Daniel Reurich wrote: >> We discussed a few weeks back in a dev meeting whether or not to revert >> to jessie like naming scheme for ethernet interfaces by default. > > My only interest would be consistency: that the same physical device > always gets the same name, even if some of them come and go. Other than > that, I'm rather indifferent as to what they are called. > > On routers and servers that I have run with Debian or Devuan, the setup > rarely changes. So there I feel it is not as much of an issue, as long > as the names end up consistent across reboots, updates, and eventual > upgrades. > > However, on notebooks that I have run with Debian or Devuan, a single > machine can rotate through three or more Ethernet devices each with > different characteristics, any or all of which can sometimes be > connected concurrently. > > /Lars > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
Note the importance of matintaining consistency between initrd and GNU environment. In Debian 9: What in initrd is called "ens3" in user environment is seen as "ens3" (OK) In Devuan 1: What in initrd is called "eth0" in user environment is seen as "eth0" (OK) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
