On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:11:33 +0200, KatolaZ wrote in message 
> <20180618121133.wqp3olaqp4rvp...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> 
> 
> >   - cdrom:           5%
> 
> ..of these, we have 2 archs, amd64 and i386, both with cd-1, cd-2 and
> cd-3 (which I didn't DL), which could be set up with 3 different boot

The figure includes only cd-1. 

> loaders to help people with cranky hard hardware get their hardware
> going with one of the alternative boot loaders, if the default one
> fails for them.  
> 

Sorry for asking, but how many reports do we have of the standard
boot-loader on ASCII cd-1 failing to boot? And even if such a report
existed, there is still minimal-live which uses syslinux and requires
only 128MB of RAM. This should cover pretty much any consumer
Intel-compatible machine produced in the last 20 years.

We must solve problems that exist first, and after that maybe focus on
those problem that could possibly exist, especially if their solution
requires extra work ;)

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to