Hallo, Oliver,
Du meintest am 29.02.12:
> It looks like you dont need the dns-functionality of dnsmasq.
Sorry - I don't like the ISC DNS ("bind"/"named"). It's a monster.
> So maybe you would feel more comfortable with the original dhcp-
> server (version 3), where the configuration language is more
> explizit as in dnsmasq (@dnsmasq-develoopers: your program is great,
> Im using it excessivly, especially the script triggering, but in
> this special case the alternative dhcpd could be the better
> decision).
Maintaining the DHCP list for the ISC-dhcpd is an ugly job.
I'd prefer the simple lines "dhcp-host=..." from "dnsmasq".
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
