Hallo, Oliver, Du meintest am 29.02.12:
> It looks like you dont need the dns-functionality of dnsmasq. Sorry - I don't like the ISC DNS ("bind"/"named"). It's a monster. > So maybe you would feel more comfortable with the original dhcp- > server (version 3), where the configuration language is more > explizit as in dnsmasq (@dnsmasq-develoopers: your program is great, > Im using it excessivly, especially the script triggering, but in > this special case the alternative dhcpd could be the better > decision). Maintaining the DHCP list for the ISC-dhcpd is an ugly job. I'd prefer the simple lines "dhcp-host=..." from "dnsmasq". Viele Gruesse! Helmut _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss